First of all, I have to thank you for the time you spent writing the
handbook, it's really really helpfull....I wish all SER related parts
had this docs..
I'll try to get familiar with the code of the notifications and I'll
try to find something....which I don't thing so :P. I'll also merge
the two functionalities (proxy + presence) in a unique config file to
see if it works.
I hope I can provide more info these following days.
About the missing things in the presence handbook, probably the most
important is the new xcap module because in the sample config files
it's missing.
Another thing is that in the XCAP structure description, the im-rules
directory is missing, which might lead to misunderstandings. I
downloaded the structure from the iptel's ftp and inside the im-rules
there were several files corresponding to presence-rules which should
be either removed or updated with the im-rules namespaces and removing
the whitelist.
Thanks,
Samuel.
2006/5/15, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart(a)iptel.org>rg>:
Hi,
this problem I'm trying to solve with Ilker Aktuna. I try to simulate it
on my machine and let you know. Or if you solve it, please let me know.
:-)
Please, could you tell me, what things you were missing in presence
handbook? I'm trying to do it as useful as possible and whatever ideas
are welcome...
Vaclav
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:38:02PM +0200, samuel wrote:
Hi all,
I recently had a few hours and start installing the presence staff and
I have to say that I have it amost workign thanks to the presence
handbook, the mailing list and, obviously, a little bit of code
review..:P
I have two SER instances, the "proxy" and the "presence server"
(both
with last CVS code) co-located in the same host and I have an issue
when the "presence server" tries to send the NOTIFY requests. Below
there's an attched log showing the problem (on IP a.b.c.d I've got the
two instances):
3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:378: sending winfo notify
3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:383: winfo document created
3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:391: creating headers
3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:398: headers created
3(30682) DEBUG:tm:t_uac:
next_hop=<sip:a.b.c.d;transport=tcp;ftag=c77b3f33;lr=on>
3(30682) t_uac: no socket found
3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:402: request sent with result -7
3(30682) ERROR: notify.c:404: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7)
This problem appears in other places, not only in the notifications
for winfo so probably there's somthing in the selection of the
outgoing socket directing to the local IP.
From the proxy part I just ust t_forward_nonack
for the "SIMPLE"
messages with record route....maybe adding the port in
the record
route should help?
Samuel.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers