Should I set them anyway ?
I mean what happens if I don't set
any im-rules ?
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original
Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent:
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:52 PM
To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: samuel;
serusers@lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] PA error sending
notifies
No SIP client is able to set these "im-rules" documents, there
are not standardized in any way. But you can create them manually on XCAP
server...
Vaclav
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at
11:28:53AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> Hi
again,
>
> Forgive me as I don't understand as much as you about Ser
configuration.
> I still have questions:
>
> Should I change
the configuration as you described ( authorize_message("im-rules.xml") )
?
> I am using Eyebeam client; would that make a change for me ?
>
After those changes did you succeed in receiving the Xcap authorization
message/notification ?
>
> What else should I change
?
>
> Should I use im-rules.xml ? Should I change something in
Eyebeam client for using this file ?
>
> You said you had merged two
configs and now you don't get the same problem. How did you merge the configs
?
> An example configuration would be very helpful to me, if you solved
the issue.
>
> Thanks,
> ilker
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: samuel [mailto:samu60@gmail.com]
> Sent:
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:53 AM
> To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> Cc:
Vaclav Kubart; serusers@lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] PA error
sending notifies
>
> If you are using XCAP authentication for
MESSAGEs, there's a function called authorize_message that needs to have as
parameter the file name of the IM ruleset.
> For user sam, in
xcap-root/im-rules/users/sam/im-rules.xml there are
> the rules for this
function. The XML file is similar to the
> presence-rules but has
important differences (correct me if I'm wrong,
> Vaclav!!!):
> *it
only has a blacklist parameter (no whitelist!!) *the namespace is
>
different (so be carefull in copy&paste from the
> presence-rules!!!)
and, as Vaclav poitned out "proprietary" from iptel.
>
>
>
About the structure I have: x86 debian testing. Libraries versions I don't know
exactly but the ones in the testing repository EXCEPT a library which I had to
get for serweb from the stable version...but it's not affecting SER
part.
>
> Samuel.
> 2006/5/16, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.
net ) <ilkera@koc.net>:
> >
> >
>
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > What did you
mean by following:
> >
> > >Instead of
> >
>>
> > >> if (authorize_message("http://localhost/xcap")) {
> >
>
> > >there should be
> > >
> > >if
(authorize_message("im-rules.xml")){
> >
> > Btw, did you
receive my email with following questions :
> >
> > >> I
have the same problem with notification and other presence
> > >>
messages
> > with you.
> > >> Can you tell me which
Linux distribution you are using Ser on ?
> > >> Also please
include version numbers for libraries that are
> > >> required
by
> > Ser.
> > >>
> > >> I am trying to
find similarities between yours and my ser server.
> >
> >
Regards,
> > ilker
> >
> > -----Original
Message-----
> > From: serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org
> > [mailto:serusers-bounces@iptel.org]
On Behalf Of samuel
> > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:13 PM
> >
To: Vaclav Kubart
> > Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re:
[Serusers] PA error sending notifies
> >
> > Let's see if I
can finish the e-mail before gmail decides it's
> > enough...:P
>
>
> > 006/5/15, samuel <samu60@gmail.com>:
> > >
Following with the handbook...
> >
> > >
> > >
the authorize message in the sample confgi files has as parameter
> >
> the xcap root while it should have the xml file containing the
auth.rules.
> >
> >
> > Instead of
>
>
> > >
> > > if (authorize_message("http://localhost/xcap")) {
> >
>
> there should be
> >
> > if
(authorize_message("im-rules.xml")){
> >
> > >
> >
>
> > >