15 Jun
2006
15 Jun
'06
11:32 p.m.
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Its not your opinion on the documentation that i find interesting, its
how you characterize your dislike for the documentation (and repeated
expression of it)
In my opinion, if you are able to use an application you are able to
document how you use it.
I am not a C developer however i have contributed to the documentation,
and i believe it is with this type of action that Open Source
communities become strong (contribution).
Having someone constantly express what they don't like about the project
yet do little else to effect change in it serves no positive or
productive purpose
OpenSER is an excellent application and i am proud to be a part of its
community. A community that responds to impatience and contempt with
patience and wisdom
Please help us keep this community healthy because in the end it
benefits us all (in more ways that i can count)
Demanding that others solve perceived issues is generally not a good
approach (unless you are dealing with a commercial entity and has a
professional responsibility to you)
tavis
-----Original
Message-----
From: Tavis P [mailto:tavis.lists@galaxytelecom.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:04 PM
Cc: devel(a)openser.org; users(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] RE: [Users] OpenSER - one year old
Juha Heinanen wrote:
post, I
made
of code and
Why do you consider my opinion that the documentation is bad, and that it should be
maintained by the developers interesting?
Douglas Garstang writes:
made
this
My comments are constructive. I've
constructively stated several
times that the documentation is very bad. Each time I've
constructive comment, I've been attacked. In my previous
another
constructive comment. I said that maybe the reason the
documentation is so bad is that the project isn't that old.
rather that complaining, learn to read the relevant pieces
write better documentation.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
I find it interesting that you would characterize your statements as
"constructive" and the responses you've received as "attacks"
I believe this may be one of the central issues