26 Feb
2009
26 Feb
'09
2:36 p.m.
Daniel,
I hate to open up an old and tired can of worms, but are there any
recent performance tests that indicate whether rtpproxy or Mediaproxy
2.0 scales better? Mediaproxy 2.0 uses API calls into the kernel's IP
forwarding subsystem now so I wonder if it can do better than rtpproxy
running in userspace.
Like you, I much prefer rtpproxy - it's so much simpler and more
flexible to deal with.
Just wondering.
-- Alex
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 02/26/2009 12:59 AM, carl Lougher wrote:
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775
Howdy,
I'm trying to remove the media/rtp streams from an asterisk server for natted users
so would like to know if this is possible with kamailio.
yes it is possible. nathelper+rtpproxy is the option I use and prefer
because of flexibility and performances. You can see an example at:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Kamailio+1.5.x+and+RTPProxy
Qu's:
What is the best option?
rtpproxy/mediaproxy?
nathelper?
If i use kamailio to achieve this does it mean that i still have to carry the rtp streams
through the kamailio server instead?
through the rtpproxy server, which can be located on same or different
machine than kamailio.
Also will i need to change the logon info for the
clients so they now logon to kamailio then i just point registrar to asterisk?
Can i use kamailio for sip trunks to asterisk and carry rtp and natted clients media
streams rather than register to asterisk?
Yes, you can register to kamailio, see registrar and usrloc modules.
Cheers,
Daniel
Many thanks,
Taff..
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users