27 Sep
2022
27 Sep
'22
6:42 p.m.
You can use the 5.6 branch, secsipid module should be the same as in
master branch.
Otherwise, C99 should be required to be supported by the compiler
because of code in many other components, is rpm build script enforcing
an older C standard in the compiler?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27.09.22 17:31, Володимир Іванець wrote:
I will try the master branch too. Unfortunately there
is a problem
with the RPM build procedure. I will try a different approach and
update you when I have something. Thank you for your help!
In file included from core/ppcfg.c:37:0:
core/utils/snexpr.h: In function 'snexpr_op':
core/utils/snexpr.h:272:2: error: 'for' loop initial declarations
are only allowed in C99 mode
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < sizeof(OPS) / sizeof(OPS[0]); i++) {
^
core/utils/snexpr.h:272:2: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99
to compile your code
core/utils/snexpr.h: In function 'snexpr_parse_number':
core/utils/snexpr.h:286:2: error: 'for' loop initial declarations
are only allowed in C99 mode
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
^
core/utils/snexpr.h: In function 'snexpr_func_find':
core/utils/snexpr.h:322:2: error: 'for' loop initial declarations
are only allowed in C99 mode
for(struct snexpr_func *f = funcs; f->name; f++) {
^
core/utils/snexpr.h: In function 'snexpr_convert_num':
core/utils/snexpr.h:398:3: warning: implicit declaration of
function 'asprintf' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
asprintf(&e->param.stz.sval, "%g", value);
^
core/utils/snexpr.h: In function 'snexpr_create':
core/utils/snexpr.h:1193:6: error: 'for' loop initial declarations
are only allowed in C99 mode
for(struct snexpr_var *v = vars->head; v; v = v->next) {
^
core/utils/snexpr.h:1217:7: error: 'for' loop initial declarations
are only allowed in C99 mode
for(int j = 0; j < sne_vec_len(&arg.args); j++) {
^
core/utils/snexpr.h:1231:15: error: redefinition of 'j'
for(int j = 1; j < sne_vec_len(&m.body); j++) {
^
core/utils/snexpr.h:1217:15: note: previous definition of 'j' was here
for(int j = 0; j < sne_vec_len(&arg.args); j++) {
^
core/utils/snexpr.h:1231:7: error: 'for' loop initial declarations
are only allowed in C99 mode
for(int j = 1; j < sne_vec_len(&m.body); j++) {
^
core/utils/snexpr.h: In function 'snexpr_destroy':
core/utils/snexpr.h:1412:3: error: 'for' loop initial declarations
are only allowed in C99 mode
for(struct snexpr_var *v = vars->head; v;) {
^
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/builddir/build/BUILD/kamailio-5.7.0-dev1/src'
make[1]: *** [core/ppcfg.o] Error 1
make: *** [default] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.I4sU6o (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.I4sU6o (%build)
RPM build errors:
ERROR: Exception(../../kamailio-5.7.0-dev1.0.el7.centos.src.rpm)
Config(epel-7-x86_64) 1 minutes 45 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/epel-7-x86_64/result
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
# bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps
/builddir/build/SPECS/kamailio.spec
make: *** [rpm] Error 1
вт, 27 вер. 2022 р. о 17:50 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> пише:
Hello,
I just tested with git master branch using:
secsipid_check_identity("");
and started fine. Maybe is something else wrong in your config.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27.09.22 13:58, Володимир Іванець wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - Online
Nov 7-10, 2022 (Europe Timezone)
* https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/
Hello Daniel,
Sorry for the delayed response. I can confirm that I get the
"unknown command, missing loadmodule?" error when using an empty
parameter /if (secsipid_check_identity(""))/.
And thank you for the clarification about the file with the
certificate.
пн, 26 вер. 2022 р. о 19:50 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> пише:
Hello,
secsipid_check_identity("") should be ok, because the
parameter is empty, but secsipid_check_identity() is not ok,
because is no parameter.
Isn't it working when you have secsipid_check_identity("")?
It has to be one certificate, which corresponds to the key
that was used to generate the identity header. The function
does not expect many certificates and loop to see if one of
them corresponds to the key.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26.09.22 17:53, Володимир Іванець wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
Kamailio Advanced Training - Online
Nov 7-10, 2022 (Europe Timezone)
* https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/
Hello Daniel!
I started with a simpler configuration: /if
(secsipid_check_identity()) {/ and /if
(secsipid_check_identity("")) {/ - according to
documentation: /If the parameter is empty, the function is
downloading the key using the URL from "info" parameter of
the Identity header, using the value od "timeout" parameter
to limit the download time./ If this matters, I did not
configure modparam "expire" and "timeout".
When I called secsipid_check_identity with a path to the
certificate, Kamailio started as expected.
Is there something else I need to do or the
function /secsipid_check_identity/ must receive a path to
certificate as parameter? Also, is it safe to assume that
this file can contain multiple certificates?
Thank you very much!
пн, 26 вер. 2022 р. о 17:36 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> пише:
Hello,
maybe the function is provided with invalid parameters?
What's the line 47 in the file?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26.09.22 15:54, Володимир Іванець wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
Kamailio Advanced Training - Online
Nov 7-10, 2022 (Europe Timezone)
* https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/
Hello everyone!
I'm testing calls with STIR/SHAKEN with a Secsipid
module on a Kamailio version 5.6.1 and ran into a
problem. Outbound calls work fine when the function
/secsipid_add_identity/ with appropriate parameters is
called. But as soon as I add function
/secsipid_check_identity/ to my configuration, Kamilio
would not start. Here is an error message I get:
/kamailio: CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:3791]:
yyerror_at(): parse error in config file
/etc/kamailio/include/registrar.cfg, line 47,
column 39: unknown command, missing loadmodule?/
/
/
/loadmodule "secsipid.so"/ is present and is above the
function /secsipid_check_identity/ call.
Both secsipid.so and secsipid_proc.so module files are
the correct version and present on the system.
Another question is related to the rpm package build.
How do you build additional modules? I made adjustment
to the pkg/kamailio/Makefile file. In the *cfg* section
changed /$(MAKE) -C ../../src cfg/ with /$(MAKE)
FLAVOUR=kamailio include_modules="secsipid
secsipid_proc" -C ../../src cfg/. Required modules
appeared in the modules.lst file but their rpm packages
were not built.
Thank you very much!
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
Kamailio Advanced Training - Online
Nov 7-10, 2022 (Europe Timezone)
* https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/