hi
using kamailio 4.4.7 on that environment
i will try to run some test locally simulating reception of a lot presence
subscription and observe mem_copy_subs_noc(),
Just to understand, both mem_copy_subs_noc are not expected to increase,
is that right? What do they exactly mean?
Thanks
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021, 22:22 Henning Westerholt, <hw(a)skalatan.de> wrote:
Hello,
the output below indicates the memory allocated in the individual
functions. So it seems that the mem_copy_subs_noc() function allocates a
lot of memory. It is increasing over time? The final output looks like a
wrapping error, the counter goes negative.
Which version of Kamailio do you use on the
server?
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt –
https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services –
https://gilawa.com
*From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> *On Behalf Of *Albert
Petit
*Sent:* Thursday, September 9, 2021 11:42 PM
*To:* SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
*Subject:* [SR-Users] Question about suspected memory leak presence module
Hi,
I am suspecitng presence module might be having a memory leak on a
production server used by an end user (not have access to it).
The output of command kamcmd mod.stats presence shm is
Module: presence
{
mem_copy_subs(148): 25720
mem_copy_subs_noc(214): 1672201904
mem_copy_subs_noc(251): 678406560
add_event(181): 88
shm_copy_event(57): 40
shm_copy_event(50): 312
add_event(156): 40
add_event(149): 456
new_shtable(66): 5767168
new_shtable(53): 262144
init_evlist(289): 16
Total: -1938302848
}
I am not sure what mem_copy_subs_noc is meaning. And final output is
negative, SHM is incfreasing all the time but not sure of the root cause
is this a reasonable hint that a memory leak is related to presence?