27 Oct
2010
27 Oct
'10
8:54 p.m.
Well, then somebody at iptel.org should take a look at this ... because there's something wrong there ...
Regards, Ovidiu Sas
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Stefan Sayer stefan.sayer@googlemail.com wrote:
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
What is interesting in this particular 200ok, is the fact that only the IP was fixed: - the private IP was substituted with the public IP: - 192.168.254.1 -> 66.49.235.129 - the length of both IPs is the same - the port was _not_ touched - 5022 was provided and 5022 was sent back
I remember having seen this behaviour (bug) from iptel.org proxy; it seemed to me this may happen if both caller and callee are behind the same NAT.
Stefan