27 Oct
2010
27 Oct
'10
11:54 p.m.
Well, then somebody at iptel.org should take a look at this ...
because there's something wrong there ...
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Stefan Sayer
<stefan.sayer(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
What is interesting in this particular 200ok, is the fact that only
the IP was fixed:
- the private IP was substituted with the public IP:
- 192.168.254.1 -> 66.49.235.129
- the length of both IPs is the same
- the port was _not_ touched
- 5022 was provided and 5022 was sent back
I remember having seen this behaviour (bug) from iptel.org proxy; it seemed
to me this may happen if both caller and callee are behind the same NAT.
Stefan