Most softphones allow that. When you are specifying a SIP server, for default (normally) it uses 5060. If you want to alter this port just do the following:
ser_IP_address:port_number
Jose Simoes
p.s. this works with X-Lite
On 12/5/05, Andrey Kouprianov <andrey.kouprianov@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess it depends on your softphone... if it chooses to communicate
from port 5060, there's nothing you can do about it, unless you can
change it in the phone's settings...
Some softphones, for instance, get a random port...
On 12/5/05, sagar <vids_cs@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using ser 0.8.14 +asterisk B2bua.
>
> Currently softphone is registering on standard sip port 5060 .
> Is it possibe to use any other port like 5090 or 8069
>
>
> I tried to do so by changing the listining port to 5090 in
ser.cfg but in
> case the softphone is not getting register.
>
>
> Here is the ser log
>
>
> 0(11348) SIP Request:
> 0(11348) method: <REGISTER>
> 0(11348) uri: <sip:
192.168.1.100>
> 0(11348) version: <SIP/2.0>
> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=1
> 0(11348) end of header reached, state=5
> 0(11348) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
> 0(11348) parse_headers: this is the first via
> 0(11348) After parse_msg...
> 0(11348) preparing to run routing scripts...
> 0(11348) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searchi ng for max_forwards header
> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=128
> 0(11348) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=8
> 0(11348) DEBUG: add_param:
> tag=fa37b062306344d68023aed26289e820
> 0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: epid=f657995ecc
> 0(11348) end of header reached, state=29
> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=256
> 0(11348) end of header reached, state=9
> 0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37];
> uri=[sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090]
> 0(11348) DEBUG: to body [<sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090>
> ]
> 0(11348) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER>
> 0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
> 0(11348) found end of header
> 0(11348) find_first_route(): No Route headers found
> 0(11348) loose_route(): There is no Route HF
> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=33554432
> 0(11348) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.100] ==
> [192.168.1.100
]
> 0(11348) check_self - checking if port 5090 matches port 5060
> 0(11348) check_self: host != me
> 0(11348) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on
> entrance=0xffffffff
> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=-1
> 0(11348) parse_headers: flags=60
> 0(11348) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=58712, isACK=0
> 0(11348) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching
> 0(11348) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
> 0(11348) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
> 0(11348) check_via_address(192.168.1.2,
192.168.1.2, 0)
> 0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb6165fe8
> 0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb6165ffc
> 0(11348) SER: new transacti on fwd'ed
> 0(11348) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil)
> 0(11348) receive_msg: cleaning up
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks In Advance.
>
>
> ________________________________
> Yahoo! Personals
> Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
> Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers@iptel.org
> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers