9 Aug
2011
9 Aug
'11
6:09 p.m.
Am 09.08.2011 16:40, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo:
2011/8/9 Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>at>:
I wouldn't call it a bug. It is a limitation of how sip-router works,
probably a design decision from early SER days. To overcome this
limitation and allow manipulation of all branches (not only the main
branch), features like the branch route were added.
Any maybe I only want to manipulate a single branch. IMO manipulating
all branches is as buggy as manipulating just a single branch - it
depends on what the user needs.
regards
Klaus
AFAIK no. But you can do it in a "branch
route" for every branch separately.
And isn't it a bug? why the RURI username is just changed in a single
branch? Theorically operations over RURI made in a route block should
affect to all the branches, am I wrong? it's the very same as giving
value to a flag or AVP after doing loockup and fetching multiple
contacts. If I inspect such flag or AVP in branch_route I should find
it for every branches. Why should changing the RURI behave different?
IMHO it's a bug, or do I miss something?