15 Mar
2013
15 Mar
'13
9:48 a.m.
On 3/13/13 10:00 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
13 mar 2013 kl. 09:35 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
There could be the possibility that some of the functions in the chain
of uac_req_send() set port to default 5060 if not set explicitly, but
from sending point of view, it should the same as for the rest of
messages. Thus a look over the code should be done as well. I'll do it
soon if nobody gets the time meanwhile.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin
- http://conference.kamailio.com -
On 3/13/13 9:25 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
I will
debug in more detail. Had to set an outbound URI with a hostname and a port number to get
it to work. 13 mar 2013 kl. 09:08 skrev Daniel-Constantin
Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
yes.
Have you watched the dns traffic? Is directly A/AAAA query? Afaik, this function should
use just the usual logic to determine the next hop based on dst-uri/r-uri. Hello,
do you set the port in r-uri/dst-uri?
No. That would invalidate SRV record lookup,
right?