I would say yes, if you do not call other functions that alter the
r-uri/dst_uri, except lookup("location").
Daniel
On 08/30/05 19:43, Richard Z wrote:
Just a thought... is it possible to ingore the nat
flag and just rely
on the existence of dst_uri to indicate a NATed UA?
On 8/29/05, *Klaus Darilion* < klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at
<mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at>> wrote:
Ho Bodgan!
To use branch routes for branch-only NAT traversal also the nathelper
and mediaproxy functions must be adopted to work in branch routes.
regards
klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi,
indeed, prior branch_route, there is only one set of flags
shared by all
branched - that's still unchanged.
regards,
bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Klaus Darilion writes:
>
> > The nat flag which will be loaded during lookup() - will it
be set
> for > each branch so it can be queried in
branch_route for all
of the
> > registered contacts, or should I use
isdsturiset() instead of
> testing > for the NAT flag?
>
> i don't think that there is any changes regarding nat flag
yet. nat
> flag is set if any of the contacts is behind
nat. it would be
nice if
> nat flag would be automatically set in branch
route only if
contact of
> the corresponding branch is behind nat.
>
> -- juha
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org <mailto:Users@openser.org>
>
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
<http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org <mailto:Users@openser.org>
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users