ljzhang,<br>
<br>
Also, one post is usually sufficient to get a response from this mailing list.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Paul<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/12/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">ljzhang</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:xueyou38@163.com">xueyou38@163.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi all,<br><br>Here is my confusion about SER supporting NAT transversal.<br><br>1. With only RTPProxy, what kinds of types of NAT can SER with nathelper transverse?<br>2. What's the difference between MediaProxy and RTPProxy?
<br>3.
If UA supports STUN, do SER need to configure nathelper to support NAT
transversal? Just because I knew STUN protocol only process a few kinds
of types of NAT, I want to know what advantage it will add if I
configure SER with nathelper.<br><br>Thanks a lot!<br><br><br>ljzhang<br><a href="mailto:xueyou38@163.com">xueyou38@163.com</a><br>2005-04-12<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Serusers mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">serusers@lists.iptel.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers">http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>