Hi,
I tried to not
calling append_branch() when last successful next_gw() using
below code :
$var(z)=0;
$var(a)=0;
if
(!load_gws(1, $rU, $fu))
{
sl_send_reply("502", "Unable To lOad GatEwAyS");
exit; }
while(next_gw())
$var(z) = $var(z) +1;
xlog("L_INFO",
"number of gateways : $var(z)\n");
load_gws(1,
$rU, $fu);
while (next_gw()){
xlog("L_INFO", "gateway is : $ru\n");
$var(a)=$var(a)+1;
if($var(a)!=$var(z))append_branch();
}
In this case
I’m getting in contact headers the following gateways :
3,1,2
Regards,
Ali
From: Ali Taher
[mailto:ataher@vanrise.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 5:44 PM
To: miconda@gmail.com; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users
Mailing List'
Cc: 'Ali Taher~Vanrise Technical Support'
Subject: RE: [SR-Users] Kamailio second contact
header
Hi Daniel,
If it is the
case then the ordering shouldn’t be 1,2,3,3 ? but I’m
getting 3,1,2,3.
I tried to set
$(branch(uri)[-1]) = $null; after the while block , but
nothing changed L
Thanks,
Ali
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 5:28 PM
To: Ali Taher; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
List'
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio second contact
header
Hello,
next_gw() is also setting the r-uri, so for the last
successful next_gw() you should not call anymore
append_branch(). Try to remove the last branch after the while
block:
$(branch(uri)[-1]) = $null;
Cheers,
Daniel
On 04/06/15 16:01, Ali Taher wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I’m using
this method because I’m having issue with append_branch
where last gateway is listed first.
For example
if gateways are ordered in LCR_rule_target as 1,2,3 , I’m
having them in contact header as : 3,1,2,3
I’m using
below code :
if
(!load_gws(1, $rU, $fu)) {
sl_send_reply("502", "Unable To lOad GatEwAyS");
exit;}
while(next_gw()){
append_branch(); }
sl_send_reply("302","Moved Temporary");
exit;
}
Any hint
regarding the above would be appreciated.
Regards,
Ali
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org]
On Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 4:41 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio second contact
header
Hello,
the r-uri is added as a Contact address for 3xx replies -- I
don't remember if this is some RFC requirement or just an
implementation of the sl function for 3xx replies (well, I
haven't implemented those function either).
The active branches of the request are added as contact
header to the reply. So you can practically use
append_branch() as many times as you need and then do
sl_send_reply("3xx", ...). You don't need to append headers
to replies explicitely.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 04/06/15 13:59, Ali Taher wrote:
Hello,
I’m trying to build new contact header
that will be sent from Kamailio as below :
load_gws(1,
$rU, $fu);
append_to_reply("Contact:");
while (next_gw())
{
append_to_reply("$ru");
}
append_to_reply("\r\n");
sl_send_reply("300","Multiple Choices");
exit;
yet I’m getting two Contact headers as
shown in below SIP message.
How can I remove second contact header
(highlighted below in gray)
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.26.3:42528;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-4c2cc56c3145b446-1---d8754z-;rport=42528;received=192.168.26.3
To: “9612"<sip:9612@192.168.110.181>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.1a8d
From: "test"<sip:test@192.168.110.181>;tag=8571af74
Call-ID:
Y2MzOTNiOGRhMTc2NDkwZjIxNzZhYTAzZmM0OGE3NDY
CSeq: 2 INVITE
Contact:
sip:9612@C001,sip:9612@192.168.26.1,sip:9612@192.168.26.6,sip:9612@192.168.26.8
Contact:
sip:9612@192.168.26.8
Server: kamailio (4.1.8 (x86_64/linux))
Content-Length: 0
Thanks,
Ali
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com