You know, I just reread my latest email and it sounds pretty offensive.
That was NOT its intention, and I apologise.
My point is, you seem to have the mistaken impression that a lot of us
have roughly the same skill level and experience as you do when you give
guidance with SER. I assure you, this is most certainly not the case.
If it were, we wouldn't be constantly asking you for answers. :)
I would very much have given a better answer to Jesús if I HAD one, but
I don't. I myself was kind of hoping for a little more detail on that
one without having to dig through the code/modules.
N.
Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
Well, considering I was posting from my mobile (and
right now as well), didn't remember the exact names, and
iptel.org has an excellent
doc search system, I considered that well within the capabilities of people who use SER.
That should hold, BTW, for you as well, so if you think more guidance is needed, instead
of posting ironic comments, you could help the "poor" guy by looking it up
yourself and post more details.
g-)
------- Original message -------
From: SIP <sip(a)arcdiv.com>
Cc: terblas(a)gmail.com, serusers(a)iptel.org
Sent: 1.9.'07, 14:26
So are you going to tell poor Jesús what these
magical modules are, or
just leave him guessing? ;)
N.
Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
With ser 2.x there are a couple of modules for
sql direct (even raw sql) access. Should fit the bill...
g-)
------- Original message -------
From: SIP <sip(a)arcdiv.com>
Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org
Sent: 31.8.'07, 20:39
Jesús Terán wrote:
> Hello, I am using the exec_dset for access to my database mysql
> and change the uri in the calls, but I think this use more CPU
> processing, Are there other module to do the same?
>
> thanks
>
> Jesus Teran B.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
I'm aware of none pre-written for that purpose... however, you could
probably modify one in existence to do just that in C/C++ (assuming you
could reverse engineer what's going on in the modules) and it would
likely be a lot faster than spawning a shell process for each call.
N.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers