25 Sep
2006
25 Sep
'06
7:25 p.m.
If you read sec. 17.1.1.3 of RFC#3261 you'll see that the ACK must be built
almost exclusive with the HF values from the original INVITE (to-tag is
taken from reply); that should filter out SER misbehaviour.
A firmware update might help.
On 9/26/06, Teran Jesus <jteran(a)mcmtelecom.com.mx> wrote:
Hello, i have a problem with the ATA 186 in the SER 0.9.6, when i generate
a
call from my ata, when the ATA received the OK from the SER, the ATA don't
generates the ACK correctly, this missing the user in the ACK, something
like this, ACK sip:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX SIP/2.0, i believe the sip poroxy is
missing something in the OK, because i have tested this in the SER version
0.8.12 and this don't have the same problem. Do you know how can i resolv
the problem?
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers