Hi,
I have a special question regarding a mixture of parallel and serial forking, operated by
Kamailio-3.0.0.
First of all I will give you a short background information, what the target will be:
I have a SIP-server on place A, 3 gateways on place B and 3 gateways on place C). These
gateways are registered on SIP server (A) with different Q-values (e.g. GW-B1=1.0,
GW-C1=1.0, GW-B2=0.8, GW-C2=0.8, GW-B3=0.6, GW-C3=0.6). The target is, that a call for a
gateway MUST be signalled on place B and C in parallel (forking) until the call is finally
established over one of the two involved gateways on place B or C. When the prime
gateway(s) (with the highest Q-value) fail (e.g. they do not send a provisional response
within a timeout or send a negative response), the next gateway(s) should be addressed
(with the next lower Q-value), a.s.o.
The configuration works well in case that both gateways on place B and C fail at the same
time (BOTH do not send a response or BOTH send a negative
response or one does not send a response and the other one sends a negative response).
However, in case that only ONE of the two (always in parallel) addressed gateways fails,
it does not work as expected. It does nothing and/or waits for an eventually negative
response or the call setup timeout.
Configuration is done as described in the README of the TM module. It is a
mixture of the main route and a failure_route in combination with the
functions t_load_contacts() and t_next_contacts().
Does anybody have an idea how this problem could be solved or any alternative solution for
this special requirement of parallel signalisation in any case?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Klaus
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01