15 Sep
2004
15 Sep
'04
1:53 p.m.
On 15-09 21:15, Zeus Ng wrote:
Jan,
It true that the Request-URI is incorrect. However, I would not jump to
conclusion that it's Sjphone's problem yet unless it's a known problem with
their 1.0 version software.
The capture is on the wan side of a ALG device.
I did not know that there was an ALG, I wrote Sjphone because I saw
the name in the message.
From my point of perspective, the ALG does not
rewrite the address and port
correctly. That may be the problem. Looking at fw2's dump, the 200OK (packet 16), the
contact address is
sip:202.125.84.163:1585. A moment later, the same 200OK (packet 17) has
contact address of sip:202.125.84.1585. If both firewalls are the same, I
would say it's logic is wrong and causing Sjphone response with wrong
information. This is why I response in another mail that the contact address
is different on every other packet.
Mahesh,
Could you also send in the ethereal dump inside the ALG as well? That would
help isolate the problem, whether it's with Sjphone or the ALG.
Jan.