13 Mar
2005
13 Mar
'05
2:29 p.m.
I agree, I think asterisk is far more advanced (no flames please) that
SEMS, and if you dont need ser at the front end, for some lightweight
small pbx setups, then u can drop them directly into asterisk, by
routing ur inbounds to the asterisk box instead of ser.
Voicemail is really cool on it, as Steve explained below, but I am trying
to setup my MWI for my ser users using asterisk, and what Java posted
sometime ago using sipsak and sending NOTIFY back to ser.
Iqbal
PS I havent really tried SEMS, so this is a little biased :-)
On 3/13/2005, "Steve Blair" <blairs(a)isc.upenn.edu> wrote:
There are differences in the two products. It is up to
you to decide if the differences are benefits or not. In my
case I use Asterisk instead of SEMS because it allows a
telephone interface to pickup and manage messages, can
turn on/off the phone message waiting light and can allow users
to record their greetings via the telephone.
-Steve
Daniel Liu wrote:
Dear sir,
Would you tell me the benifit of asterisk to implement voicemail,
instead of SEMS?
best regards,
Daniel
Iqbal write:
Hi
I am sending unanswered calls via ser to asterisk for voicemail, however
asterisk works on extensions, which are numbers, and when I redirect the
sip request it usually has iqbal(a)sip.domain in it.
is there a good way of altering this possibly using/calling the aliases
table again before rewriting or something.
Iqbal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers