I agree, I think asterisk is far more advanced (no flames please) that SEMS, and if you dont need ser at the front end, for some lightweight small pbx setups, then u can drop them directly into asterisk, by routing ur inbounds to the asterisk box instead of ser.
Voicemail is really cool on it, as Steve explained below, but I am trying to setup my MWI for my ser users using asterisk, and what Java posted sometime ago using sipsak and sending NOTIFY back to ser.
Iqbal
PS I havent really tried SEMS, so this is a little biased :-)
On 3/13/2005, "Steve Blair" blairs@isc.upenn.edu wrote:
There are differences in the two products. It is up to you to decide if the differences are benefits or not. In my case I use Asterisk instead of SEMS because it allows a telephone interface to pickup and manage messages, can turn on/off the phone message waiting light and can allow users to record their greetings via the telephone.
-Steve
Daniel Liu wrote:
Dear sir, Would you tell me the benifit of asterisk to implement voicemail, instead of SEMS?
best regards, Daniel
Iqbal write:
Hi
I am sending unanswered calls via ser to asterisk for voicemail, however asterisk works on extensions, which are numbers, and when I redirect the sip request it usually has iqbal@sip.domain in it.
is there a good way of altering this possibly using/calling the aliases table again before rewriting or something.
Iqbal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers