So does that mean my GW is ignoring the “record-route” section? ( FYI, I control the gateway also, it is a Metaswitch)

The reason I think this is working is because I am just doing the same NAT Test that is used to determine if nat=yes should be set and setting it so that it will pass the same test. At least I think that is what it is doing. J

Natambu Obleton

Network Engineer

FastTrack Communications

nobleton@fasttrackcomm.net

(970) 247-3366 office

(970) 247-2426 fax

---

From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:25 AM
To: Natambu Obleton
Cc: serusers@iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] reinvite problem...

Yes, this is a known issue, but the solution depends on how you optimize you rtp handling (active media). The INVITE from your GW will not be NATed and as the INVITE is loose route, no lookup("location") is done to see if the dst UA is NATed.  However, this is what the nat=yes flag is supposed to be used for, to mark the dialog as NATed. Thus, the Route set from your GW should contain nat=yes and this will cause the right flag to be set for the INVITE.

Doing it in the onreply route should not work, because you need to make sure that both the INVITE from the GW and the OK from the UA are handled as rtp proxy forked. I'm not sure why it works, maybe you force rtp proxy for too many calls? (calls to the GW from NATed UAs except symmetric NATs can go without rtp proxy).
g-)

Natambu Obleton wrote:

After a crap load of tracing and putting log(“I am here\n”) all over the config file I think I may of gotten it working?

I started with the gettingstarted gw-pstn.cfg file and made this change…

I edited my onreply route[1] to setflag(6)..

onreply_route[1] {

        log("******************************ONREPLY ROUTE[1]\n");

Added:        if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && client_nat_test("7")) {

Added:                log("******************************ONREPLY ROUTE[1] set_flag\n");

Added:                        setflag(6);

Added:        }

        if ((isflagset(6) || isflagset(7)) &&

            (status=~"(180)|(183)|2[0-9][0-9]")) {

                log("******************************ONREPLY ROUTE[1] flag_set\n");

                if (!search("^Content-Length:[ ]*0")) {

                        use_media_proxy();

                        log("******************************ONREPLY ROUTE[1] use_media_proxy\n");

                };

        };

        if (client_nat_test("1")) {

                log("******************************ONREPLY ROUTE[1] fix_nated_contact\n");

                fix_nated_contact();

        };

}

Natambu Obleton

Network Engineer

FastTrack Communications

nobleton@fasttrackcomm.net

(970) 247-3366 office

(970) 247-2426 fax

---

From: serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Natambu Obleton
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:19 AM
To: serusers@iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] reinvite problem...

Ok. I have SER working with mediaproxy and it rewrites the requests to goto the Mediaproxy server as it should, but after a call has been up for a bit.. it gets another invite from my PSTN gateway and when this invite comes through it doesn’t rewrite the media addresses why?

My config:

http://laplata.fasttrackcomm.net/ser_cfg.txthttp://laplata.fasttrackcomm.net/ser_cfg.txt

My transaction log:

http://laplata.fasttrackcomm.net/translog.txt

About ¾’s of the way down you will see where 206.123.213.84 sends another invite for the call and SER doesn’t change the media information on it. Thanks for your help.    

Natambu Obleton

Network Engineer

FastTrack Communications

nobleton@fasttrackcomm.net

(970) 247-3366 office

(970) 247-2426 fax

 





 
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers