Thanks Daniel for response
Sure packaging rules must be same for all dists.
Could you make same comment at
This will allow track this request
чт, 21 февр. 2019 г. в 12:31, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
On 21.02.19 07:39, Sergey Safarov wrote:
Current kamailio package (checked via RPM) is contains lot of modules.
Some of this is not important to include in every kamailio installation.
May be create own packages for this modules and other in next 5.3 branch?
Modules examples:
benchmark.so
db_cluster.so
db_text.so
rtpengine.so
rtpproxy.so
sipcapture.so
siptrace.so
sipt.so
sms.so
smsops.so
ss7ops.so
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1862
use of such modules is a matter of deployment type and for example, for
residential services, rtpengine or rtpproxy are like a must. I also use
often benchmark module to track execution of some operations (like http
queries). Also, siptrace is rather common in what I deal with.
IMO, it is hard to make a selection on usage or personal preferences. The
rule was that was has same dependencies as core, they should be packaged
together.
Actually there was a discussion to add more to the main package, from
those with additional dependencies, but very used (like tls, ...) -- it
might be on issue tracker as well.
Then, Victor Seva mentioned at some point in time that in debian is better
to keep modules groupped as many as possible, because introducing a new
package in the official distro requires a complex process of review for
license, etc...
Overall, if there is a decision to regroup some modules in different
packages, I would like to follow the same for both debs and rpms, otherwise
installation guidelines can end up to be different and can become confusing.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 --
www.kamailioworld.com
Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC,
USA --
www.asipto.com