3 Feb
2010
3 Feb
'10
4:38 p.m.
El Miércoles, 3 de Febrero de 2010, Alex Balashov escribió:
On 02/03/2010 04:22 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Maybe, however it would be solved with your suggestion (inspect the "Contact"
in the 200 from the natted UA and "fix" the private address.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
However this trick is not needed at all to fix
just the signalling as the
"Contact" URI (so the dialog target uri) was already replaced in the
initial INVITE/200, and it cannot change within a dialog.
Checked the RFC, you are right.
Then, what the OP must be implying is that the PSTN UA is not following
original Contact/dialog target URI bound at start of dialog and is
following new Contact (with RFC1918 address) sent in re-INVITE?