for example, allow_source_address() executes next function:

int match_addr_hash_table(struct addr_list** table, unsigned int group,
        ip_addr_t *addr, unsigned int port)
{
    struct addr_list *np;
    str addr_str;
    avp_value_t val;

    addr_str.s = (char*)addr->u.addr;
    addr_str.len = 4;

    for (np = table[perm_hash(addr_str)]; np != NULL; np = np->next) {
        if ( (np->grp == group)
                && ((np->port == 0) || (np->port == port))
                && ip_addr_cmp(&np->addr, addr)) {

            if (tag_avp.n && np->tag.s) {
                val.s = np->tag;
                if (add_avp(tag_avp_type|AVP_VAL_STR, tag_avp, val) != 0) {
                    LM_ERR("setting of tag_avp failed\n");
                    return -1;
                }
            }

            return 1;
        }
    }

    return -1;
}

... and I see an avp being added over the tag_avp. Is it another one?

Daniel
On 06/01/14 12:59, Kelvin Chua wrote:
checking the source code, looks like, it's not being set at all on any of those functions

Kelvin Chua


On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,


On 04/01/14 21:47, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Kelvin Chua writes:

is the peer_tag_avp used on allow_source_address_group?
based on fast scan of permissions module source, it appears that
peer_tag_avp is set only by allow_trusted function.
the peer tag avp should be set also for allow_address() and allow_source_address(). I don't think it is set for allow_source_address_group().

Cheers,
Daniel

--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda



_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda