I think it’s also worth noting that SEMS is very lean and efficient, and can be easily pared down to doing exactly what you need it to do and not an ounce more. FS is a bureaucratic and resource-hungry monster by comparison.
I use SEMS myself and like it very much. It’s sad to see it fall away and I regret that I personally lack the resources to prop it up. Nevertheless, I think it’s a fact that it’s not a dependable input in a future-proof way for lack of active public development and (much) maintenance. I think in the most optimistic view it is merely “very unpolished”.
— Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On Dec 25, 2021, at 1:34 PM, Noah Mehl noahmehl@gmail.com wrote:
Just from my understanding, what feature/s does SEMS have that Freeswitch does not?
Thanks!
~Noah
On Dec 25, 2021, at 1:30 PM, Juha Heinanen jh@tutpro.com wrote:
Alex Balashov writes:
I still believe it’s fair to say that there exists no significant commitment to the future of the open-source version, not as a matter of critical mass.
You wrote about SEMS not being maintained. Maintaining and significant contributions are two different things.
It would be great if there would be more contributions to SEMS. I use SEMS because there is nothing else open source (or perhaps not even commercial) that even close could serve as a replacement.
-- Juha
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
- sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
- sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: