Hello
I did the same Changes long time ago, but i have the same issue even
when always goes more to one IP, and we really know when will go to
the Next IP also is there a way if the endpoint is down will the calls
go to the next IP automatically?
i have the same table scenario with .5 and .5 in the prob, and hits
one IP more than the other.
__________________________
O
On Jul 30, 2009, at 4:27 PM, michel freiha wrote:
Dear Uriel,
I found it...The problem was in the makefile of carrierroute
module...I did Chged the following:
DEFS+=$(CONFUSEDEFS)
LIBS=$(CONFUSELIBS)
TO:
DEFS+=-I$(LOCALBASE)/include
LIBS=-L$(LOCALBASE)/lib -lconfuse
It seems that carrierroute needs that in order to be compiled on
Solaris
Thanks a lot for the help
Regards
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:32 PM, michel freiha <michofr(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Dear Uriel,
It worked fine as you mentionned below and Y.Y.Y.Y is used when I
changed the domain to 1 on X.X.X.X
Regards
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Uriel Rozenbaum <uriel.rozenbaum(a)gmail.com
wrote:
It's really weird. Try changing
the domain on the X.X.X.X host to 1,
so you only have Y.Y.Y.Y host available as first option.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:07 PM, michel freiha <michofr(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Dear Sir,
I did 2 calls from the same endpoint to the same number and get 2
different IDs but still forwarding the calls to X.X.X.X as follow:
Call1:
call-id for this call 56549e09d94c1430Jul 30 17:00:32 [10607]
DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: searching in carrier default,
id 5
Jul 30 17:00:32 [10607] DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: tree
default, domain 0 : 0
Jul 30 17:00:32 [10607] DBG:carrierroute:rewrite_on_rule: searching
for matching routing rulesJul 30 17:00:32 [10607]
DBG:core:hash_func: hash: 1307293616 % -2147483648 = 1307293616
Jul 30 17:00:32 [10607] INFO:carrierroute:cr_do_route: uri
009613089187 was rewritten to sip:001232333333@X.X.X.X
Call2:
call-id for this call 063197524438d55dJul 30 17:02:18 [10605]
DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: searching in carrier default,
id 5
Jul 30 17:02:18 [10605] DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: tree
default, domain 0 : 0
Jul 30 17:02:18 [10605] DBG:carrierroute:rewrite_on_rule: searching
for matching routing rulesJul 30 17:02:18 [10605]
DBG:core:hash_func: hash: 931879127 % -2147483648 = 931879127
Jul 30 17:02:18 [10605] INFO:carrierroute:cr_do_route: uri
009613089187 was rewritten to sip:001232333333@X.X.X.X
Any suggestions?
Regards
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Uriel Rozenbaum <uriel.rozenbaum(a)gmail.com
wrote:
The random value is based on the
Call-ID, use debug=4 and add an
XLOG as follows before every call to cr_route:
xlog("L_ERR", "call-id for this call $ci");
Check the call-id is different every time and the CRC32 algorithm to
calculate the hash values gives a different answer.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:49 AM, michel freiha <michofr(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
When restarting kamailio I found out that it reads both routes
Jul 30 11:46:40 [9165] INFO:carrierroute:rule_fixup_recursor:
hashless rule with host Y.Y.Y.Y hash hash_index 1
Jul 30 11:46:40 [9165] INFO:carrierroute:rule_fixup_recursor:
hashless rule with host X.X.X.X hash hash_index 2
I jjst do not know why it's not reading the prob
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:39 PM, michel freiha <michofr(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Dear Sir,
Please find below carrierroute table...
+----+---------+--------+-------------+-------+------+------+-------
+--------------+----------------+----------------+-------------+
| id | carrier | domain | scan_prefix | flags | mask | prob | strip
| rewrite_host | rewrite_prefix | rewrite_suffix | description |
+----+---------+--------+-------------+-------+------+------+-------
+--------------+----------------+----------------+-------------+
| 1 | 5 | 0 | 00 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0
| X.X.X.X | | | NULL |
| 2 | 5 | 0 | 00 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 0
| Y.Y.Y.Y | | | NULL |
+----+---------+--------+-------------+-------+------+------+-------
+--------------+----------------+----------------+-------------+
on kamailio.conf:
if(!cr_route("default", "0", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id")){
sl_send_reply("403", "Not allowed");
} else {
# In cas of failure, re-route the request
t_on_failure("1");
# Relay the request to the gateway
t_relay();
}
When trying to call 00123456666 the call is forwarded all the time
to X.X.X.X IP and never to Y.Y.Y.Y IP...why this happening? It's
like Kamailio is not reading prob field
Regards
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Uriel Rozenbaum <uriel.rozenbaum(a)gmail.com
wrote:
I'm really not sure how it
works when you use a 0 prob.
Try something like 50/50 and check if the requests go to both servers.
Also, some extract from /var/log/messages will help.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:38 AM, michel freiha <michofr(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Dear Sir,
My tables are defined as below:
carrierroute table:
id carrier domain scan_prefix flags mask
prob strip rewrite_host
19 5 1 00 0
0 0 0 IP_address1
19 5 1 00 0
0 1 0 IP_Address1
route_tree table:
id carrier
5 default
In kamalio.cfg:
if(!cr_route("default", "1", "$rU", "$rU",
"call_id")){
The issue is that kamailio is forwarding all calls to IP_Address1
and never to IP_Address2 even if prob is 1 for IP_Address2 and 0 for
IP_Address1
Any help please?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Uriel Rozenbaum <uriel.rozenbaum(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Michel,
The prob field is to set the proportion of a certain entry to be
taken when you are load balancing between carriers.
To perform an overflow operation you have to use the domain field.
Check the samples on the module documentation; it's preety clear
there; if you have further questions just post them here.
Rgds,
Uriel
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:39 AM, michel freiha <michofr(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using carrierroute module and ie seems that it's not working
well...Suppose I have 2 entries in carrierroute table...Entry 1 with
scan prefix 00 and prob 0 and a second entry with scan prefix 00 and
prob=1...As soon as i make a call, this call will be forwarded to
the entry with prob 0 because i guess it appears before the one with
prob 1 in the table...
When starting Kamailio I got the below:
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
1, prob -14931260.000000
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: domain 0
not found, add it
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_tree: tree
default has 1 trees
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] DBG:carrierroute:add_route_tree: tree 0Jul
29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: created route
tree: 0, with id 0
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
now adding
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed
up rules
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix ,
prob -14931260.000000
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
domain 0
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
now adding
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed
up rules
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
011, prob -14931260.000000
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
domain 0
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
now adding
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed
up rules
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
00, prob -14931260.000000
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
domain 0
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
now adding
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed
up rules
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
111, prob -14931260.000000
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
domain 0
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
now adding
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed
up rules
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
00, prob -14931260.000000
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
domain 0
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
now adding
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed
up rules
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix ,
prob -14931260.000000
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
domain 0
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
now adding
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed
up rules
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
011, prob -14931260.000000
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
domain 0
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
now adding
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed
up rules
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
011, prob -14931260.000000
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
domain 0
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
now adding
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed
up rules
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix ,
prob -14931260.000000
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
domain 0
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
now adding
Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed
up rules
It seems that kamailio is not reading probability entry in carrier
route table
Please find below carrierroute table structure:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `carrierroute` (
`id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
`carrier` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
`domain` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '',
`scan_prefix` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '',
`flags` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
`mask` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
`prob` float NOT NULL default '0',
`strip` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
`rewrite_host` varchar(128) NOT NULL default '',
`rewrite_prefix` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '',
`rewrite_suffix` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '',
`description` varchar(255) default NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=23 ;
Can someone help me to find this issue?
Regards
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users