13 Apr
2018
13 Apr
'18
9:29 p.m.
I guess you're right...
But if it is possible to do this with different means, I would prefer it...
I think I only miss the following points:
* Does $nh(d) work when the Route header enforces the next-hop in an
in-dialog request?
* Is it safe to determine next hop for responses by looking at the first
Via header only, or are there exceptions to this?
BR,
George
On 13 April 2018 at 21:20, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> wrote:
That's probably true of any Kamailio
functionality. :-) But point taken.
On April 13, 2018 2:09:10 PM EDT, George Diamantopoulos <
georgediam(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Well, the "SIP routing with Kamailio"
book by Daniel and Elena states:
"Defining the onsend_route should be done only if really needed,
because it
is executed for each request sent out, excluding the retransmissions."
Also, it similarly won't work for responses, only for requests...
On 13 April 2018 at 21:00, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
wrote:
-- Alex
--
Sent via mobile, please forgive typos and brevity.
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
"A simpler way to do it, of course, would be
to use the onsend_route,
but
that would most likely introduce an unnecessary
overhead for all
routed
messages."
What informs that assumption?
I suppose there is a measurable nonzero performance penalty to
anything,
> but it should be negligible.
>
> -- Alex
>
> --
> Sent via mobile, please forgive typos and brevity.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>