5 Oct
2004
5 Oct
'04
12:46 p.m.
At 11:18 AM 10/5/2004, mahesh wrote:
Andrei,
Any significant reason on why this is being done??
yes. to make sure that majority of devices that are symmetric but
are silly not to advertise it using rport work. It will fail
for those which are not symmetric -- I am not worried about
them too much, they should be.
-jiri
Mahesh
At 08:59 PM 10/1/2004, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
On Oct 01, 2004 at 10:16, mahesh
<mahesha(a)intoto.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Hi Andrei,
Thanks for the reply.
I am using the publicly available iptel proxy server(195.37.77.99) to test
my implementation of SIP-ALG. I am using the following configuration
HOST1(winXP)---FW---Internet---HOST2(winCP)
FW is the firewall/NAT device, which has the ALG implementation. I am using
SJPhone on my hosts to communicate using SIP(UDP). I observe that the
responses to requests sent by HOST1 come from the proxy(iptel) to the
source port(of FW), from which the request was sent, instead of on VIA.
There is no "rport" field in the VIA header field of the request.
Does anyone know if the iptel proxy server is configured to use
"force_rport".
Yes, it is.
Andrei