12 Nov
2008
12 Nov
'08
10:17 p.m.
Hi Tomasz,
Thanks for replying. It looks like I am having a NAT issue? Sometimes it works in one way,
and sometimes cannot reach the peer. Will it matter for communicating IM between two NATed
peers? I know we have to use some NAT helper or rtpproxy to solve the NAT traversal for
voice/video. How about the IM?
Thanks,
Ling
----- Original Message ----
From: Tomasz Zieleniewski <tzieleniewski(a)gmail.com>
To: lin9k(a)yahoo.com
Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 1:45:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Is msilo module necessary to make IM work in SER? SER doesn't
forward MESSAGE
Hi,
msilo module is used for reliable delivery in case when someone is offline.
There has to be something wrong in Your ser.cfg.
Any way I would switch to ser2.0 much more powerful!:)
Regards
Tomasz Zieleniewski
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:05 AM, <lin9k(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi,
I used two IM (SIMPLE based) clients to communicate through SER. However, I could only
see clients kept sending MESSAGE to SER but SER never forwarded them to the peer.
I was not using msilo. I am not sure if that's the cause that SER didn't forward
to the other end. Or, do I need any special configuration in ser.cfg, or any different
version of SER? I was using ser-0.9.6.
Thanks in advance!
Ling
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers