23 Mar
2009
23 Mar
'09
12:54 p.m.
2009/3/23 Alexandr Dubovikov <shurik(a)start4.info>fo>:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Iñaki Baz
Castillo wrote:
don't forget to disable ping for this gateway, because finaly you will have
a DDOS effect of the "offline" gw. :-)
Well, If the host is already offline then it doesn't matter to kill it more XD
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
2009/4/1 Alexandr Dubovikov
<shurik(a)start4.info>fo>:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:21:20PM +0100, Andreas Heise wrote:
>> Hello Iñaki,
Hi Inaki,
Hi all,
Thanks for pointing it out.
However, if a gw takes so long time (~32 seconds) to respond I prefer
to consider it as "offline" :)
you should ask Alexandr he has introdused this feature with rev5452,
but I'm not sure if he is on the lists all the time, so I'll forward your
question
to him...
sorry, I am currently offline and couldn't answer directly to the list.
anyway. I agreed, 180 seconds it's too big ping interval, but it couldn't be
also less 32 seconds.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt
17.2.2 Non-INVITE Server Transaction
T1 = 500 ms.
Timer J 64*T1 for UDP Section 17.2.2 Wait time for
0s for TCP/SCTP non-INVITE request
so, the timer for "completed" is 32 seconds and couldn't be less.
of course, you can use less value, but on own risk :-)
RFC 3261 are not recommendet it :)