Hello,
this is a static string: ”sip:.*@192.168.111.138"
It means you redirect any number to '.*'.
To preserve the incoming number, use:
$ru = "sip:" + $rU + "(a)192.168.111.138".138";
Cheers,
Daniel
On 9/6/12 3:40 PM, Fatima Chahrour~Vanrise Support wrote:
Dear Daniel,
Attached is my config file.
Is it correct to set $ru=”sip:.*@192.168.111.138"; in case I need any
number to be redirected to 192.168.111.138.
Thanks.
*From:*sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Fatima
Chahrour~Vanrise Support
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 05, 2012 5:19 PM
*To:* miconda(a)gmail.com
*Cc:* 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
Users Mailing List'
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] FW: Kamailio as sipRedirect
Hi Daniel,
The call is not redirected to 1^st kamailio, below is the call trace
where 2^nd kamailio(192.168.111.139) send request to 192.168.111.15
which is the gateway in the lcr rule instead of sending this invite to
192.168.111.138.
U 192.168.111.139:5060 -> 192.168.111.15:5060 (shouldn’t this be
192.168.111.138:5060 instead??)
INVITE sip:22#96135050@192.168.111.15 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.111.139;lr=on>.
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.111.138;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.111.139;branch=z9hG4bK5757.5b3b1975.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.111.138;branch=z9hG4bK5757.50ff9264.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.52.139:12650;received=192.168.111.11;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-85008205ba3ea607-1---d8754z-;rport=12650.
Max-Forwards: 68.
Contact: <sip:106@192.168.111.11:12650>.
To: "96135050"<sip:96135050@192.168.111.138>.
From: "106"<sip:106@192.168.111.138>;tag=56645478.
Call-ID: ZjJlYWYzZmJmYmJlMGE0MmYxYWUwYjYwZmY5MmJkMjg..
CSeq: 1 INVITE.
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE,
SUBSCRIBE, INFO.
Content-Type: application/sdp.
User-Agent: X-Lite release 1100l stamp 47546.
Content-Length: 477.
This is my Kamailio routing logic configured on the 1st Kamailio to
forward any call from 1^st kamialio to 2^nd kamailio:
if (is_method("INVITE"))
{
Sethostport(“192.168.111.139:5060”);
Append_branch();
}
My problem is hereàThis is my Kamailio routing configured on 2^nd
kamailio which I want from it to send back the call, with lcr_gateway
already defined, to 1^st Kamailio:
if (is_method("INVITE"))
{
if (!load_gws("1")) {
sl_send_reply("503", "Unable to load gateways");
exit;
}
if(!next_gw()){
sl_send_reply("503", "Unable to find a gateway");
exit;}
route(1);
$ru="sip:.*@192.168.111.138";
send_reply("302","rEdIrEcTeD");
km_append_branch("uri");
}
Am looking through many documents but can’t achieve my target, I want
the 2^nd Kamailio, which has LCR configured on it, to send back to
1^st Kamailio the gateway from lcr_gateways with 302 redirect message.
My questions are:
How to achieve this?
Do you suggest any document that help?
Do I need to load any specific module?
Thanks,
F Chahrour
*From:*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 05, 2012 9:38 AM
*To:* Fatima Chahrour~Vanrise Support
*Cc:* 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
Users Mailing List'
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] FW: Kamailio as sipRedirect
Hello,
You set r-uri ($ru) to an IP address only -- it has to be a full SIP URI.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 9/4/12 5:34 PM, Fatima Chahrour~Vanrise Support wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your reply.. am able to make the call reach from 3CX to
Kamailio using the src_ip, thank you, but still not able to
redirect the call invite from Kamailio to 3CX and send the 302
message.
Kamailio instead of 3CX
192.168.111.138
Kamailio
192.168.111.139
Phone A (192.168.111.11)
302
Phone B (192.168.111.10)
Herby what am putting in my routing:
If (is_method("INVITE"))
{ if(!load_gateway("1")) {
sl_send_reply("503", "unable to load gateways");
Exit; }
{ if(! next_gateway()) {
sl_send_reply("503", "unable to find gateways");
Exit; }
Route(1);
$ru = "192.168.111.138" <%22sip:.*@192.168.111.138%22>;
send_reply("302", "Redirected";
Km_append_branch(“uri”);
Exit;
What am I doing is wrong in the above script? And causing “call
failed”! attached ‘test.txt’ the ngrep capture if needed.
Your help is highly appreciated.
Kind Regards,
F Chahrour
*From:*sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org>
[mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of
*Daniel-Constantin Mierla
*Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:56 AM
*To:* Fatima Chahrour
*Cc:* SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER)
- Users Mailing List
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] FW: Kamailio as sipRedirect
Hello,
if you know the IP address of 3CX, then you can skip
authentication for that, like:
if(src_ip==__3cx_ip__) {
# don't do authentication for the traffic coming here
}
You can use permission module to store the a list of ip addresses
and then use functions from that module to match against source ip
of requests, as alternative to above, providing more flexibility
when dealing with lot of trusted ip addresses.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 8/29/12 9:15 PM, Fatima Chahrour wrote:
Hello Danial,
Hereby details:
My current working 1st scenario is a call generated from
A-party x-lite registered on kamalio, this call is routed
based on kamailio lcr routing module which add prefix and send
prefix to 3CX then 3CX forward the call to B-party x-lite,
registered on 3CX, successfully.
In kamailio.cfg routing logic I only used :
...
If (is_method("INVITE"))
{ if(!load_gateway("1")) {
sl_send_reply("503", "unable to load gateways");
Exit; }
{ if(! next_gateway()) {
sl_send_reply("503", "unable to find gateways");
Exit; }
Route(1);
....
Now, my target is to register also the A-party x-lite to 3CX
where I added a rule in 3CX to forward the call comming to
kamailio to take the route desicion and act.
So, here I need to know how can I tell kamailio to accept the
call from 3CX? this is what I meant by configuring 3CX on
kamailio.
I have weakness in the routing logic configuration, could you
please help in this too! What is the required replacement on
the above to be done?
Moreover, I appreciate if you provide with docs or tutorials
that can help me understand more kamailio's routing logic
functions!
Much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
F Chahrour
Sent from iPhone
On Aug 29, 2012, at 9:21 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
On 8/29/12 3:31 PM, Fatima Chahrour~Vanrise Support wrote:
Dears,
I have an installed 3CX where I want to generate a
call from it to the Kamailo to get a list of suppliers
to terminate the call to.
Thus, the Kamailio should act as a sip redirect to the
3CX (for routing decision).
Have you tried such configuration before? And how do I
configure the 3CX on the Kamailio?
I don't understand what you expect from 'configure the 3CX
on the Kamailio', can you add more details ?
For sending a redirect, practically you have to update
request uri and then send the 3xx reply, like:
$ru = "sip:newnumber@newdomain.com"
<sip:newnumber@newdomain.com>;
send_reply("302", "Redirected";
If you need to put more contacts in the redirect reply,
then add:
km_append_branch("uri");
uri parameter can contain variables.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/kat
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/kat
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/kat