Re: [SR-Users] Consistency: -1 sometimes true, sometimes false

Hello, On 23.08.17 10:36, Alex Balashov wrote: this kind of inconsistency it's a bag that had to be carried over the time due to initial version of the scripting language back in 2001-2002 when it was decided how to evaluate the return codes for functions/routing blocks. At that moment there were no config variables, so it was considered to make it simple with: - evaluate negative return to false - evaluate 0 (zero) return to 'exit' - evaluate positive return to true Starting with year like 2004-2005, with the addition of the variables, they were evaluated as integer numbers, more or less like in C. Boolean variables are not defined for config, so it is better (and more explicit) to evaluate PVs values against numbers. In short: boolean evaluation of a return code for a function is done differently that the evaluation of returned value by a variable. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com