21 Apr
2008
21 Apr
'08
12:25 a.m.
Personally I think the software itself is same or better than industry
average.
The challenge for reliability is in configuration and network design. If
you would like to make it really resillient against various hard
conditions, you are going to spend quite some time on the network design
and test with SIP UAs you are going to use if they can deal with it.
-jiri
Jeremy A wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking at a project which requires a higher than normal reliability
for a SIP server. The project involves risk-of-life communications. The
volume of traffic is quite low.
I have been using SER in embedded applications for some time now without
problems but I am now looking at a larger scale project.
Assuming I can provide hardware server(s) with suitable characteristics,
then :
- How reliable is SER?
- In each version?
- In each module?
Are there any well established high availability configurations for SER?
Are there any risk-of-life deployments I can reference?
We may well use SEMS for part of the project so the same questions apply.
I'm not expecting 100% reliability, just a system that matches or
exceeds present high reliability PABX deployments.
If you are of the honest opinion that SER is not good enough, what SIP
server products should I be looking at? Or is SIP not suitable full stop?
Thanks in advance
Jeremy
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers