10 Oct
2006
10 Oct
'06
12:31 p.m.
Hi Jose,
I guess the address of the lb is 192.168.1.23, right? I see in receive
ACK no Route hdr or RURI containing this address....
also, are you sure you ACK hits loose_route() ? how the RURI is changed
doesn't reflects a loose_route() but more a static routing into the
script...
regards,
bogdan
Jose Gil Navarrete wrote:
ACK sip:gil@192.168.1.28 SIP/2.0..
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.28:3806;branch=z9hG4bK8010c001d753db11bc2c000f1f72ea95..
Route: <sip:192.168.1.20;lr=on;ftag=20935>..
From: alex <sip:alex@192.168.1.28:3806>;tag=20935..
To: <sip:gil@192.168.1.23>;tag=80892cfed653db1187ca000f1f72ea95..
Call-ID: 80892CFE-D653-DB11-BC2B- 000F1F72EA95(a)192.168.1.28..
CSeq: 2 ACK..Contact: <sip:alex@192.168.1.28:3806>..
Max-Forwards: 70..
Content-Length: 0....
And, this is the message that the balancer openser server send:
ACK sip:gil@192.168.1.20:5060 SIP/2.0..
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.23;branch=z9hG4bK9411.466dcab6.2..
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.28:3806;branch=z9hG4bK8010c001d753db11bc2c000f1f72ea95..
Route: <sip:192.168.1.20;lr=on;ftag=20935>..
From: alex <sip:alex@192.168.1.28:3806>;tag=20935..
To: <sip:gil@192.168.1.23>;tag=80892cfed653db1187ca000f1f72ea95..
Call-ID: 80892CFE-D653-DB11-BC2B-000F1F72EA95(a)192.168.1.28..
CSeq: 2 ACK..Contact: <sip:alex@192.168.1.28:3806>..
Max-Forwards: 69..
Content-Length: 0....
Regards!
*/Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro>/* escribió:
Hi Jose,
you need both record_route() and loose_route().
regards,
bogdan
Jose Gil Navarrete wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi
In my server I have:
if (!method=="REGISTER"){
setflag(1);
setflag(2);
record_route();
}
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:36:49 +0300
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Subject: Re: [Users] Problem with module
dispatcher
To: Jose Gil Navarrete
Cc: users(a)openser.org
Message-ID: <451CBF01.9030508(a)voice-system.ro
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello,
do you do record routing on server? The ACK should follow Route
headers.
A network trace (ngrep, ethereal) will help to identify the
cause for
the problem.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 09/29/06 00:29, Jose Gil Navarrete wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have implemented the load balance in mode statefull, I
obtained the
next
messages:
phone1 dispatcher
sipserver phone2
--------INVITE--------> ----INVITE----------->
----INVITE-------->
<----100 TRYING---- <---100 TRYING---- <---100 TRYING----
<----180 RINGING-- <---180 RINGING--- <---180 RINGING---
<----200 OK---------- <----- 200 OK-------- <---200
OK--------
-------- ACK --------> --------- ACK -------->
You can see that the sipserver never sends ACK message to
video_phone2.
Is this correct?
Then I try the next, in the sipserver:
if (method =="ACK"){
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
return;
}
But the sipserver doesn't send the message ACK at the phone2?
Does some body know what it's wrong?
Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y
*2GB* extra a tu
correo
por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y *2GB* extra a tu correo
por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx