14 Dec
2005
14 Dec
'05
6:32 p.m.
Ok, I'm very confused about this. Bogdan mentioned that the RURI is consumed? When is
it consumed?
-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:31 AM
To: Douglas Garstang
Cc: users(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] More Routing....
append_branch will add a new branch. But the t_relay in failure route
only uses the new branch, as the previous branch is alreaddy terminated.
klaus
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Klaus,
But, doesn't append_branch cause parallel forking? I don't want parallel forking.
If I do parallel forking, the same registration may get delivered to the same Asterisk box
twice, and that's not what I want.
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:01 AM
To: Douglas Garstang
Cc: users(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] More Routing....
Where's the problem? in route[1] or in the failure route?
You need append branch in failure route
klaus
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Can someone please tell me why the following
extremely simple example doesn't first attempt to relay to 192.168.10.7, and then if
that fails, try 192.168.10.8? What am I missing here? The documentation says that
t_relay() simple sends statefully to the current URI.... seems to be what I am doing. What
am I missing? Please help!
route(1);
route[1] {
rewritehostport("192.168.10.7:5060");
t_on_failure("2");
t_relay();
}
failure_route[2] {
rewritehostport('192.168.10.8:5060");
t_relay();
}
Doug.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users