,On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:57, Kalala Alexander <klistrod@yandex.ru> wrote:Why, then, documentation writing about this flag "force"?Look at the RTPproxy module, which supports another RTP proxy. Both modules share a history and a protocol.š/Oš19.01.2015, 15:54, "Alex Balashov" <abalashov@evaristesys.com>:,Correct. Not supported.š--
SentšfromšmyšBlackBerry.šPleasešexcusešerrorsšandšbrevity.
From: Kalala AlexanderSent: Monday, January 19, 2015 7:45 AMTo: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing ListReply To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing ListSubject: [SR-Users] RTPenginešHey there!
Have a question modulo rtpengine.šFunction rtpengine_offer ([flags]):It is not clear, this flag "force" does not work in this module?
forceš- instructs thešRTPšproxy to ignore marks inserted by anotheršRTPšproxy in transit to indicate that the session is already goes through another proxy. Allows creating a chain of proxies. Not supported and ignored by Sipwise rtpengine.
š--
ó Õ×ÁÖÅÎÉÅÍéÎÖÅÎÅÒ ÐÏ ÔÅÌÅËÏÍÍÕÎÉËÁÃÉÑÍšëÁÌÁÌÁ áÌÅËÓÁÎÄÒšvel: 375291146285life: 375256819996skype: klistrodšVoIP Network Engineer
dCAP, CCNAVoice
Kalala Alexanderšš_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-usersšš--
ó Õ×ÁÖÅÎÉÅÍéÎÖÅÎÅÒ ÐÏ ÔÅÌÅËÏÍÍÕÎÉËÁÃÉÑÍšëÁÌÁÌÁ áÌÅËÓÁÎÄÒšvel: 375291146285life: 375256819996skype: klistrodšVoIP Network Engineer
dCAP, CCNAVoice
Kalala Alexanderšš_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users