On Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2009, Bruce McAlister wrote:
Maybe you can
solve it by a mixture of kamailio tables and your tables
format. For example, "location" table is purely for Kamailio to store
location of registered client - thus integration with other systems is
often not needed. On the other hand, the "subscriber" table (user
provisioning) is often already present in different format.
I previously used Kamailio's location table for registration handling,
but instead of Kamailio's subscriber/user-avps/domain/db_aliases/...
table I used views which map the existing provisioning DB-structure to
Kamailio's structure (e.g. subscriber/domain/db_aliases are usually only
read-only - so it easy to make views).
This seems like it could be an easier route to get Kamailio/SIPRouter
into our environment. I will take a look at what is involved in
following the approach you suggest. Do you know where I can find the
table definitions for each module? Would it be listed in the module
documentation?
Hello Bruce,
i also think this would be an easier way. For some of the important functions
(like auth, location) there exists also some ways to use AVPs instead of the
table content, so you could build your own queries with the sqlops module. And
then you could do also a lot of checks in the script just with the PVs,
transformations and logic operators.
You find the scheme definition docs in the wiki at
http://www.kamailio.org:80/dokuwiki/doku.php - point "Database structure".
Regards,
Henning