Re: [Users] t_replicate after failure

Douglas Garstang wrote:

Ok, I worked out that you need to use append_branch, like this:

append_branch (proxy1) append_branch (proxy1) t_replicate (proxy3)

That's what the devevelopers say anyway...

However, all the t_replicate's are going to exactly the same proxy. Here's a post by two people that have reported _exactly_ the same problem. Is there a solution?

If I remember right, there was a solution using t_relay_udp_non_ack (or similar) instead of t_replicate (not sure anymore). Look again in the archive.

klaus

http://www.archivum.info/serusers@iptel.org/2004-12/msg00268.html

Thanks, Doug.

-----Original Message----- From: Douglas Garstang Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:11 PM To: users@openser.org Subject: [Users] t_replicate after failure

In the scenario below, if the first t_replicate fails because 192.168.10.5 returns "Not Found", the second t_replicate command does not execute. Why? How can I make it execute? Call me crazy, but this doesn't seem at all intuitive to me. In a functional programming world, if the first fails, the next should still run.

if (method=="REGISTER") {

                    # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication
                    if (!www_authorize("voip.com", "subscriber")) {
                            www_challenge("voip.com", "0");
                            exit;
                    };

                    save("location");
                    t_replicate("192.168.10.5","5060");
                    t_replicate("192.168.10.7","5060");
                    exit;
            };

Thanks, Doug.

---

Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

---

Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users