14 Apr
2009
14 Apr
'09
11:29 a.m.
Yes update the cr README.... That we be just peachie!!! ;^)
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf
Of Henning Westerholt
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 4:59 AM
To: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] carrier route vs LCR
On Friday 10 April 2009, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Hi Juha,
no, it also keeps the entries in the memory, it don't do any run-time DB
operations for normal routing. Perhaps the original poster referred to the
pre 1.5.0 state, before your refactoring of the LCR code base. I'll see if i
can update the cr README a bit.
Cheers,
Henning
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.11.54/2056 - Release Date: 04/13/09 17:56:00
I have been
looking at the carrier route and LCR. it appears to me that
LCR can be used to handle tariff , i.e,
selecting lowest cost route. while carrier route doesn't have this
capability at all. but carrier route , according to LCR, scales better
than LCR.
what you mean by "according to LCR"? i'm not familiar with carrier
route, but i don't see any other scaling limits with LCR except memory
for lcr and gw entries.
perhaps carrier route does not keep its corresponding entries in memory,
but fetches them each time from database?