12 Sep
2006
12 Sep
'06
8:53 a.m.
Yes, You're right. And quite soon the docs will be made more available
at iptel.org and you (and others) will be allowed to update
documentation, as well as comment to give input to future versions ;-)
g-)
sip wrote:
Yet again, we see the value of having good
documentation.
Rtpproxy's is somewhat... lacking. Having a comment in code or in the
changelog does not equate to good documentation.
N.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:52:54 -0400, Andres wrote
olivier.taylor wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
wow greger,
where is the doc about that fonctionality?
Wich version are we talking about?
* 2005-02-24 Added support for using more than one rtp proxy, in which
* case traffic will be distributed evenly among them.
In addition, * each such proxy can be assigned a weight,
which will specify * which share of the traffic should
be placed to this particular * proxy. * *
Introduce failover mechanism, so that if SER detects that one *
of many proxies is no longer available it temporarily decreases
* its weight to 0, so that no traffic will be assigned
to it. * Such "disabled" proxies are periodically
checked to see if they * are back to normal in which
case respective weight is restored * resulting in
traffic being sent to that proxy again. * * Those
features can be enabled by specifying more than one "URI" *
in the rtpproxy_sock parameter, optionally followed by the
weight, * which if absent is assumed to be 1, for example:
*
* rtpproxy_sock="unix:/foo/bar=4 udp:1.2.3.4:3456=3
udp:5.6.7.8:5432=1"
This has been available for over a year now.
Olivier
Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
> FYI: The newest version of rtpproxy can do load balancing...
> g-)
>
--
Andres
Technical Support
http://www.telesip.net
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers