Yes, You're right. And quite soon the docs will be made more available at iptel.org and you (and others) will be allowed to update documentation, as well as comment to give input to future versions ;-) g-)
sip wrote:
Yet again, we see the value of having good documentation.
Rtpproxy's is somewhat... lacking. Having a comment in code or in the changelog does not equate to good documentation.
N.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:52:54 -0400, Andres wrote
olivier.taylor wrote:
wow greger,
where is the doc about that fonctionality? Wich version are we talking about?
- 2005-02-24 Added support for using more than one rtp proxy, in which
case traffic will be distributed evenly among them.In addition, * each such proxy can be assigned a weight, which will specify * which share of the traffic should be placed to this particular * proxy. * * Introduce failover mechanism, so that if SER detects that one * of many proxies is no longer available it temporarily decreases
its weight to 0, so that no traffic will be assignedto it. * Such "disabled" proxies are periodically checked to see if they * are back to normal in which case respective weight is restored * resulting in traffic being sent to that proxy again. * * Those features can be enabled by specifying more than one "URI" * in the rtpproxy_sock parameter, optionally followed by the weight, * which if absent is assumed to be 1, for example:
rtpproxy_sock="unix:/foo/bar=4 udp:1.2.3.4:3456=3udp:5.6.7.8:5432=1"
This has been available for over a year now.
Olivier
Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
FYI: The newest version of rtpproxy can do load balancing... g-)
-- Andres Technical Support http://www.telesip.net
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers