6 Apr
2003
6 Apr
'03
3:26 a.m.
On Apr 05, 2003 at 18:38, Sergio Miguel Garcia <sergio(a)cooltechintl.com> wrote:
I have been testing the last changes about the
"rport-received" tags, and I
have found the next bug:
[...]
I've been checking other pairs of ports sent and received like 1667-33542,
1507-58117, 1509-58629, 1511-59141 and the second is the network address
order of the first ( 1667 = ntohs(33542) ) .
I think that you forget to make a htons() of the port received in host
format before sending the packet back to network.
Yes you're right (well almost, I did an extra htons -- the port was kept in
network byte order).
Please, let me know when this issue is solved in the CVS.
It should be fixed, however I haven't tested it. I hope I didn't miss
anything :-)
Thanks,
Andrei