I never had any issues thus I do not think I can reproduce it.
Nobody of us has time to try to reproduce your problem which nobody of
us ever had. So you have to provide the details of your problem (e.g.
message dump of INVITE, 200 OK and ACK and description of your setup and
the relevant kamailio.cfg lines (where you do the rewriting uf RURI and
forwarding). Then we happily try to help you.
regards
Klaus
On 15.07.2013 13:21, hiro wrote:
I don't know the RFC well enough, but as every
other protocol works I
think it's a kamailio bug.
You should be able to reproduce this, I don't think I've done anything special.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
> Inspect the received ACK (log $mb) and check the RURI, and Route headers.
> Maybe the show some bugs. Also, if you manually apply routing to in-dialog
> requests (e.g. forcing the send socket) make sure to not make mistakes.
>
> regards
> Klaus
>
>
> On 12.07.2013 17:52, hiro wrote:
>>
>> hi
>>
>> I have set up tls on kamailio successfully, but when I relay a TLS
>> client to an other proxy ($ru = "sip:" + $rU + "@" +
>> "127.0.0.1:5070;transport=udp";) via udp I get error messages.
>>
>> From the timing it seems like this warning always appears after I get
>> 200OK from proxy, the Invite gets sent correctly, but kamailio seems
>> to fail while sending back the ACK.
>>
>> 18(11231) WARNING: <core> [forward.c:270]: WARNING: get_send_socket:
>> protocol/port mismatch (forced udp:77.180.86.63:5060, to
>> tls:127.0.0.1:5070)
>>
>> TCP->UDP works.
>> TCP->TCP works.
>> UDP->UDP works.
>> UDP->TCP works.
>> TLS->TCP works.
>> TLS->UDP doesn't work.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>