20 Nov
2010
20 Nov
'10
11:27 a.m.
El Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:15:27 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> escribió:
This should not be that complex, there is no function
name that has '.'
in order to have current conflicts to solve. My concern is related to
modules with very long names, but seems that most of such cases do not
export lot of functions (e.g., presence_*).
Alternative is to introduce a short id for modules, eg,:
ps => presence
rp => rtpproxy
Both of them could be used. One short version for expert people and the long,
full format for newbies or in didactical examples.
I think this module.function syntax is a good idea.