Many thanks for the reply,
it is very useful but it contains bad news because, if is it possible, it is
important for me to preserve the possibility to have the SIP proxy and SIP
gateway in the same board.
Some other clarification:
1. I have two ethernet interfaces, if I give
different IP address to proxy and gateway, can I leave them on the same
hardware?
2. If I correctly understand the transaction
creation in SER: SER absorbs the retransmission only if already exists a
transaction for the original INVITE and SER creates a new transaction for an
INVITE only when is invoked the t_relay. Consequently, If a retransmitted INVITE arrives when the
elaboration of the original INVITE is still in progress, SER repeats all the
elaboration also for the second INVITE.
Do you confirm my
description?
I have built a function that in
heavy load traffic condition could be slow (it does an external query, something
similar to an exec) and it is important that I don’t invoke it twice for the same INVITE, so I try to use
t_newtran to anticipate the transaction creation before invoking this
function.
However, as first step, I will remove the t_newtran, t_forward_nonack_uri and I try again.
Thanks again.
-----Messaggio originale-----1. DON'T have UA2 and SER on the same server. You are very likely to get problems because SER sees it's own IP address in a message destined for UA2
Da: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
Inviato: mercoledì 6 settembre 2006 9.19
A: Zappasodi Daniele
Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org
Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] Retransmission problem
2. Don't use t_newtran and t_forward_nonack_uri unless you know exactly what you do (and probably not then either)
3. When having problems like that, use a pretested Getting Started config fil (http://iptel.org/ser/doc/gettingstarted). If you still have the problem, there is something external (like UA2 on same box as SER). Fix it and then compare the logic of your config file with the Getting Started reference config
g-)
Zappasodi Daniele wrote:Hello, I have a big problem with the retransmissions. In my tests sometimes the retransmission handler doesn't seem to work properly and it resends the INVITE after receiving a final response. Moreover it doesn't respect the time-out (instead wait 1 second it resends the packet after few decimal), but this is a minor item. An example: INVITE sip:31203 From 32201 UA1(32201) ---> SER ---> UA2(31203) INVITE UA1 ---> SER ---> UA2 Trying UA1 <--- SER 183 UA1 <--- SER <--- UA2 480 UA1 <--- SER <--- UA2 ACK UA1 ---> SER ---> UA2 ... Other call. After 0,5 msec SER sends again the first INVITE to UA2: INVITE SER ---> UA2 183 SER <--- UA2 etc. In the attached zipped file there are the syslog, the ser config file (only the relevant parts) and the ethereal captures related to this example. Some additional information: SER version is 0.9.2, compiled for arm. In my scenario SER and UA2 are on the same box. In LAN_capture.cap file there is the message flow between UA1 and SER, in lo_capture.cap between SER and UA2. Can someone explain me this behaviour? Maybe something wrong in my config file? Note that I use t_lookup_request, t_newtran, t_forward_nonack_uri in order to recognize retransmitted INVITE, could it be here the problem? thanks ********************************************************************** The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message inerror. **********************************************************************
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers