Re: [SR-Users] app_lua sr.sqlops.query exit status

Now the backtrace is different, gram the output for info locals in frame 5 and 6. Cheers, Daniel On 10.01.18 11:26, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: > I have overwritten the core file b y accident. I did a new backtrace: > > (gdb) backtrace > #0  0x00007fd3b24365a0 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #1  0x00007fd3b2437b62 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #2  0x00007fd3b242a040 in lua_settable () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #3  0x00007fd3b243a412 in luaL_findtable () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #4  0x00007fd3b243a581 in luaL_openlib () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #5  0x00007fd3b2684870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs (L=0xeffdb0) at > app_lua_sr.c:1973 > #6  0x00007fd3b26cf107 in lua_sr_openlibs (L=0xeffdb0) at > app_lua_api.c:185 > #7  0x00007fd3b26cf7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:225 > #8  0x00007fd3b265b97d in child_init (rank=-127) at app_lua_mod.c:197 > #9  0x0000000000549944 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fd3bc82cc70, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:938 > #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child (rank=-127) at > core/sr_module.c:964 > #11 0x0000000000422c1c in main_loop () at main.c:1576 > #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffeee95b548) at > main.c:2646 > > (gdb) frame 7 > #7  0x00007fd3b26cf7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:225 > 225     app_lua_api.c: No such file or directory. > (gdb) list > 220     in app_lua_api.c > (gdb) info locals > L = 0xeffdb0 > txt = 0x7fd3bd00dce7 <__fprintf+135> "H\201\304", <incomplete sequence > \330> > li = 0x0 > sbuf = {st_dev = 0, st_ino = 206158430256, st_nlink = 140732901208248, > st_mode = 4002787296, st_uid = 32766, st_gid = 4002787464, __pad0 = > 14, st_rdev = 140728898420739, st_size = 0, >   st_blksize = 30795, st_blocks = 7970120, st_atim = {tv_sec = > 7929944, tv_nsec = 0}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 0, tv_nsec = > 140732901208128}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 140547210663782, >     tv_nsec = 7938688}, __glibc_reserved = {-541165879423, > 140732901208240, 5544260}} > __FUNCTION__ = "lua_sr_init_probe" > > I assume that in this case i need to do a "frame 7". > > > Jan > > Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-10 11:18: >> Few more things to grab from core file with gdb -- take the output for >> the next commands: >> >> frame 16 >> >> list >> >> info locals >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> >> On 10.01.18 11:08, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>> Daniel, >>> >>> Here are the app_lua settings: >>> >>> # ----- app_lua params ----- >>> modparam("app_lua", "load", "/etc/kamailio/kamailio_functions.lua") >>> modparam("app_lua", "register", "sqlops") >>> modparam("app_lua", "register", "siputils") >>> modparam("app_lua", "register", "xhttp") >>> >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-10 11:03: >>>> Can you give here the parameters you set for app_lua module? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09.01.18 22:27, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>>> Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> Here is the backtrace. >>>>> >>>>> (gdb) backtrace >>>>> #0  0x00007fe41140e067 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at >>>>> ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56 >>>>> #1  0x00007fe41140f448 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 >>>>> #2  0x00007fe41144c1b4 in __libc_message >>>>> (do_abort=do_abort@entry=1, >>>>> fmt=fmt@entry=0x7fe411541210 "*** Error in `%s': %s: 0x%s >>>>> ***\n") at >>>>> ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:175 >>>>> #3  0x00007fe41145198e in malloc_printerr (action=1, >>>>> str=0x7fe41153d42a "realloc(): invalid next size", ptr=<optimized >>>>> out>) at malloc.c:4996 >>>>> #4  0x00007fe41145476b in _int_realloc (av=av@entry=0x7fe41177e620 >>>>> <main_arena>, oldp=oldp@entry=0x21789c0, oldsize=oldsize@entry=736, >>>>> nb=nb@entry=1552) at malloc.c:4234 >>>>> #5  0x00007fe411455769 in __GI___libc_realloc (oldmem=0x21789d0, >>>>> bytes=1536) at malloc.c:3029 >>>>> #6  0x00007fe40c460cae in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #7  0x00007fe40c45c9aa in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #8  0x00007fe40c46166d in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #9  0x00007fe40c4640b3 in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #10 0x00007fe40c45ccd1 in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #11 0x00007fe40c45c92e in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #12 0x00007fe40c45d7bb in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #13 0x00007fe40c45d8c2 in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #14 0x00007fe40c459528 in lua_load () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #15 0x00007fe40c469d8c in luaL_loadbuffer () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #16 0x00007fe40c6fe7d7 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:228 >>>>> #17 0x00007fe40c68a97d in child_init (rank=-127) at >>>>> app_lua_mod.c:197 >>>>> #18 0x0000000000549944 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3b998, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:938 >>>>> #19 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3bec0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #20 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3c708, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #21 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3cd78, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #22 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3d360, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #23 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e1e8, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #24 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e938, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #25 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3f4c8, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #26 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3fca0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #27 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40118, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #28 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40780, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #29 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c422f8, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #30 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42968, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #31 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42e50, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #32 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43b48, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #33 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43f20, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #34 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c446e0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #35 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44bd0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #36 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44ec8, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #37 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45378, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #38 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c458f0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #39 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45e48, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #40 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c464e8, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #41 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47278, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #42 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c476f0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #43 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47b68, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #44 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child (rank=-127) at >>>>> core/sr_module.c:964 >>>>> #45 0x0000000000422c1c in main_loop () at main.c:1576 >>>>> #46 0x000000000042aab9 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffe17f0e788) at >>>>> main.c:2646 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 22:21: >>>>>> Can you install the debug symbols for kamailio as well? There >>>>>> should be >>>>>> a kamailio-dbg package or so ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Then take again the backtrace, it should provide more >>>>>> information -- >>>>>> file and line for each frame, ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Daniel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 09.01.18 21:21, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>>>>> Daniel, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just upgraded to 5.1 but kamailio now generates a core file. I'm >>>>>>> running debian 8.10. It seems to crash on liblua5.1.so.0 : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Using host libthread_db library >>>>>>> "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". >>>>>>> Core was generated by `kamailio -m 1500'. >>>>>>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >>>>>>> #0  0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> (gdb) backtrace >>>>>>> #0  0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> #1  0x00007f30c17f3b62 in ?? () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> #2  0x00007f30c17e6040 in lua_settable () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> #3  0x00007f30c17f6412 in luaL_findtable () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> #4  0x00007f30c17f6581 in luaL_openlib () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> #5  0x00007f30c1a40870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>>>> #6  0x00007f30c1a8b107 in lua_sr_openlibs () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>>>> #7  0x00007f30c1a8b7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>>>> #8  0x00007f30c1a1797d in ?? () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>>>> #9  0x0000000000549944 in ?? () >>>>>>> #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child () >>>>>>> #11 0x0000000000421498 in main_loop () >>>>>>> #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main () >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl schreef op 2018-01-09 20:53: >>>>>>>> Daniel, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently running kamailio 5.0.5. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 13:27: >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> what version of kamailio are you using? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 07.01.18 22:14, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm doing some tests with a lua script and app_lua. I'm using >>>>>>>>>> sr.sqlops.query to insert records into the database but would >>>>>>>>>> like to >>>>>>>>>> test the exit status of the sql query. In kamailio i can do: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> if(!sql_query("kamailio", "INSERT INTO subscriber ...")) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is there some kind of exit status for the lua function >>>>>>>>>> sr.sqlops.query >>>>>>>>>> in order to do the same check in lua? In other words, is it >>>>>>>>>> possible >>>>>>>>>> to check if a sql query was successful in lua? The result >>>>>>>>>> seems >>>>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>>> nill in all cases for a INSERT in lua using sr.sqlops.query. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jan Hazenberg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >