29 Apr
2024
29 Apr
'24
4:19 p.m.
I had no idea the Chinese syndicated my article:
https://www.cnblogs.com/shunzh/p/14360712.html
Ah well.
Yeah, just use set_contact_alias() / handle_ruri_alias(). These flags are unnecessary and
a source of much confusion.
On Apr 29, 2024, at 9:17 AM, Benoit Panizzon
<benoit.panizzon(a)imp.ch> wrote:
Hi Alex
--
Alex Balashov
Principal Consultant
Evariste Systems LLC
Web: https://evaristesys.com
Tel: +1-706-510-6800
I wouldn't worry too much about these.
They're kind of an anachronism.
I just stumbled over your article:
https://www.cnblogs.com/shunzh/p/14360712.html
This helps a bit. After looking again at the issue I observe, I think I
have narrowed it down on the alias not being set on the replies.
So a 200 OK from a CPE behind nat, has a contact pointing to the IP
behind nat. Thus an ACK to that 200 OK is being routed to the IP behind
NAT.
I will keep digging into this and probably just have to get rid of
trying to understand how the NAT flags are being used in those examples
I found earlier.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden
______________________________________________________
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch
______________________________________________________