Tomasz, it is strange, but it works for me without any patches. Please, could you send me your msilo module parameters?
thanks
Vaclav
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:28:29AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Thanks michal,
I did it and it worked after patch there appeared an analogous error in the m_dump(..) function in the msilo.c I made the similar correction and now everything works fine. I attached my patch for both things:)
Cheers tomasz
Hi, try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time.
Michal
On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi michal,
I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. my output below:
ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch patching file msilo.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {Cheers tomasz
You can try apply patch like this: diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {And please fill bug report at tracker. Michal
On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
And here is ser.cfg: xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); if (m_store ("0", "")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); sl_reply_error(); } }
the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl
Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. Content-Length: 12. Max-Forwards: 70. . test message # U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". .
Thanks for any feedback! Cheers Tomasz
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers