Perhaps the source of my misunderstanding is something to do with branching.
The actual case I am troubleshooting is a 503 generated via t_reply out of a failure route. The complaint is that this 503 contains a modified From header, exposed to the originator of the call.
-- Alex
--
Sent from my Samsung mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a proper keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Those originated locally were never using the original value if you
called msg apply changes -- you can try with an older version, if it
does that, then it is a bug somewhere :-).
Btw, if you called msg apply changes after creating the transaction,
then SL is out of scope and tm local reply is using the initial
values, but that means the changes are only for that branch, a
failure route will get the initial request content.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/2/12 9:30 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
The expected behaviour is that all replies, both relayed and
endogenously originated (via SL or TM), as well as sequential
requests directed back to the caller, will preserve the original
headers.
-- Alex
--
Sent from my Samsung mobile, and thus lacking in the
refinement one might expect from a proper keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/
Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Not sure what is 'work as you expect', provided the details I gave
in the previous mail related to local replies.
Otherwise, if you don't track all dialogs, could be an issue if
some of the replies are ok and some are not.
I will check the uac module and add a parameter to not use dialog
module even if loaded, if such option is not already there.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/2/12 9:11 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
So, you're saying that if all the dialogs were tracked,
everything would work as I expect it to?
-- Alex
--
Sent from my Samsung mobile, and thus lacking in the
refinement one might expect from a proper keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/
Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com>
wrote:
I think there was an addition to use dialog module to store
initial and new values. I don't know if it can be turned off or
is automatically when the dialog module is loaded - just to see
if that is the cause.
However, if you do msg_apply_changes(), local replies will use
the new headers. I'm pretty sure it happened the same before --
e.g., it was no way to revert back so that sl can use older
values of the headers. Perhaps you can revert from config,
changing the header to initial value that you store in an avp,
apply changes and send the reply.
Received and relayed replies should be converted.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/2/12 8:57 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
I should be clearer: when I say "internally generated", I
don't mean it in the sense of 408 or something else opaquely
generated by the proxy. I mean internally generated as in
originating from the proxy, e.g. something sent with
sl_send_reply() or t_reply().
-- Alex
--
Sent from my Samsung mobile, and thus lacking in the
refinement one might expect from a proper keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/
Alex Balashov <abalashov@evaristesys.com>
wrote:
Hello,
I am using the latest cloned 3.3 branch and performing a
uac_replace_from() operation. After the operation, I do
msg_apply_changes().
My 'uac' modparams are:
modparam("uac", "rr_from_store_param", "vsfc")
modparam("uac", "restore_mode", "auto")
modparam("uac", "restore_passwd", "xxxxxxxxx")
However, the modified From URI is getting back to the
originator, both
in internally generated errors, and in relayed replies.
This didn't used to happen before 3.3, but has been
outstanding for
quite some time (I didn't look at it much until now). Is
there some
possibility that there is a >= 3.3 bug? Or, have I simply
misconfigured
something?
Thanks!
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/,
http://www.alexbalashov.com/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat
Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat
Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat
Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu