Re: [Serusers] SER + RTPProxy and Client behind NAT

Yes it can do this, RTPproxy is just that, a proxy. It has the ability to use whatever port it pleases, try running rtpproxy command line mode (rtpproxy -f ) to see if it's passing any errors. What kind of device is the UA? Be sure that the device has "NAT mode" on, this sounds like a problem I was having early on. -----Original Message----- From: Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya [mailto:mahesh@aptela.com] Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 5:00 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] SER + RTPProxy and Client behind NAT I'm having a strange problem with getting SER+RTPProxy to work when the UA is behind NAT Setup is as follows UA --> NAT1 --> SER+RTPProxy --> NAT2 --> Asterisk I've got RTPProxy running in "bridge" mode, gatewaying 'tween Asterisk and the Public Internet SIP traffic all routes perfectly. STUN enabled clients work perfectly. The problem is that if the outbound port on NAT1 for the RTP stream is *different* from the outbound port from the UA, then RTPProxy persists in sending the packets to the UA port, *not* the NAT1 port. e.g. if the SDP payload from the UA contains c=IN IP4 192.168.5.100 m=audio 16396 RTP/AVP.... but NAT1 sends the RTP stream out on port 64003, then rtpproxy sends the media from Asterisk back to port 16393 at NAT1, instead of to port 64003 at NAT1! Is it supposed to do this? Am I missing something really obvious? The relevant section from ser.cfg is as follows if (nat_uac_test("3")) { if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; }; rewritehostport("........"); if (force_rtp_proxy("FEI")) { t_on_reply("4"); }; . . . onreply_route[4] { if (!(status=~"183" || status=~"200")) { break; }; fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy("F"); break; } begin:vcard

_______________________________________________