7 Apr
2005
7 Apr
'05
11:53 p.m.
Ok, here's a little more info. It seems that the procs are getting
knocked off one by one at different places in the script. Sometimes it's
a register, sometimes it's a reply (ack), random stuff. I have break; at
each ending point, any suggestions?
-----Original Message-----
From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 1:30 PM
To: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Child procs
Matt,
Why do you believe that you have been running out of processes? At any
given time you may have processes without CPU load, but over time the
processes should have some CPU time.
Have you run serctl ps? AFAIK, the standard number of processes for
each
protocol (udp/tcp) is 8 unless you specify children=x.
If a ser process blocks due to problems with mysql or a radius failover
situation, you may get a problem where all processes blocks.
g-)
Matt Schulte wrote:
bueller? someone must have some clue
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schulte
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:26 AM
To: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Child procs
Does anyone have any opinions on this? What I'm worried about is of
course running out of procs and thus hanging SER, I believed this to
have happened several times..
Thanks..
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schulte
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:45 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Child procs
Do increasing child procs actually do anything? When I do a 'ps axu' I
only show 4 of the procs having CPU time, the rest
having no cpu time
at all. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Matt
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers