16 Jan
2003
16 Jan
'03
9:39 a.m.
This was the first path I took. Unfortunately, I need to talk to people who
are behind two different Intertex IX66 boxes, which do not support UPnP.
--
Dr. Craig Graham, Software Engineer
Advanced Analysis and Integration Limited, UK. http://www.aail.co.uk/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nils Ohlmeier" <nils(a)ohlmeier.de>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Cc: "Jiri Kuthan" <jiri(a)iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER on masqueraded/NAT connection
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
BTW it exist an UPnP implementation for iptables.
I'm not sure but this UPnP server maybe could solve NAT traversal with the
Windows Messenger for one or more people.
Also i don't recommed the use of this UPnP server because i could create
very
big security holes in you firewall.