30 Mar
2010
30 Mar
'10
8:27 p.m.
On 03/30/2010 01:17 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
No, r-uri is the contact address from REGISTER.
Hmm. I guess I have been doing it wrong for a long time on 1.x by
using fix_nated_contact() on REGISTER processing where NAT is
detected, instead of fix_nated_register() and separation into contact
and received as you describe. But in my case it works...
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
Tel : +1 678-954-0670
Direct : +1 678-954-0671
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Otherwise, how do you get far-end NAT traversal
for incoming calls (to
the registrants) to work?
dst_uri field is set to received ip:port, so the nat box is used as
outbound proxy.